stellarvue 82 degree eyepiece

Don, I know the FS size controls the AFOV, but I thought the F/L was inherent to the optical design? Bottom Line: A better bargain 82 eyepiece. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. They slap on the "15mm" on the side and everybody assumes it is actually 15mm, when it is really 14mm. Has similar build quality to TeleVue and has a better feel than its APM counterpart. Drop it in a barlow or a slow Mak and it's tolerable. Click here to simulate the field of viewhttps://astronomy.tools/. It is plenty wide enough and 1.25 inch 82 degree eyepieces are just so much more compact than their 100 degree counterparts. All of these factors add up to create an extremely contrasty eyepiece that is free of unwanted reflections, flaring or ghosting. I am also intrigued by the 4mm. Incredible clarity across the entire field of view. Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET, Stellarvue Optimus Eyepiece Set with Case - EOP-SET, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0. As for "triple testing" eyepieces, that I seriously doubt happens. At 564 grams even with its 2-inch adapter tube, Stellarvues Optimus is the lightest of the 100 set, a consideration for balancing smaller telescopes. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. I had the 15mm and it lasted 2 weeks in my case. Can't beat it for the price, especially since the market has gone insane. Several functions may not work. Pros: Solid construction with good eye relief. At a measured 13mm, eye relief seems a little tight, and 1.5mm less than specified, due to the eye lens being more deeply recessed than in the others. The value for current overall gradeis the numerical value corresponding to your current overall letter grade. Thanks for the input, I appreciate it. At NEAF, I purchased the 16mm UWA from Stellarvue for $95.I've owned all the WO UWAN in the past but sold off all of them except the 4mm.There was nothing wrong with them. That makes swapping eyepieces at high magnifications easier. Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. There was nothing wrong with them. Despite its modest price and sharp optics, I cant recommend it. Call us at: 530 823 7796 Open Mon-Fri 9-5 Pacific Time, 3. I do most of my observing with 82 degree eyepieces. They slap on the "15mm" on the side and everybody assumes it is actually 15mm, when it is really 14mm. Like the Ethos, it can be used as either a 2-inch or 1.25-inch eyepiece. In this complete system we include the large 28mm 2" wide field eyepiece for low power, the 8mm ultra-wide angle eyepiece for medium power, and for high power we provide the 4 mm ultra-wide angle eyepiece. I wouldn't expect additional focal lengths. Pros: Best eye relief and off-axis star images. Thanks for any input if anyone is still watching here. The one piece of information I have not been able to find here or on other forums is what FOVs people prefer, whether the specified field of view is at specific focal lengths or in general. Program Fees: 0 - 10,000 (per semester) Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #48, QS World University . Super crisp images to the edges. I briefly experimented with a 100-degree eyepiece but it felt exactly like the 82-degree field, with the exception of shorter eye relief. No question they set the standard. I doubt Vic Maris will reveal who his OEM is. Hmmm, looks like those four focal lengths are the only ones they make, at least for now. But it just matters on if you need the eye relief or not, the AT UWA 28 would be great as well if not wearing glasses. LMU - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen. Personally, I find the 70-72 degree range perfect for my needs and taste; and there are plenty of offerings in that range with adequate effective eye relief for eyeglass wearers. My conclusion from testing this 82 group was that the Explore Scientific came very close to matching the standard-setting premium Tele Vue Nagler, but at a lower price. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series.This ultra wide field eyepiece has almost 3 times the area of a 50 degree eyepiece. I present them in order of increasing price. Edited by Neanderthal, 05 March 2023 - 09:40 AM. I present them in order of increasing price. Either model represents an excellent value in a mega-wide eyepiece. Probably not by much, if at all. Even if they arent perfectly sharp to the absolute edge Im sure theyll be fine for most of the usable viewing range which should be good. Bottom Line: Very good optics and mechanics for an excellent price. I've had a few of their scopes that are well made, and well corrected, but labeled as someone elses. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. It is important the image stays sharp as it crosses the field, and it does in both eyepieces, but the Ethos SX is better for double stars and planets. Be informed, it can't hurt you. The focal length choices seems a bit odd to me: 28mm, 16mm, 7mm and 4mm, but perhaps more focal lengths will fill in the gaps later. The 4 and the 8mm have barlow lenses in them and they are the same eyepiece other than the barlow lens. The rubber eyecup can be raised higher with the use of an included extension ring; a twist-up mechanism would have been preferable. Features --20mm focal length --100 apparent field --15mm eye relief --9 element design --fully multi-coated Today, they report 4mm, 8mm, and 15mm and are $50 apiece less expensive, at $149 each. In eyepieces, models with the extreme apparent field of 100 rank at the top for performance - but also price! The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". Now if you had a more expensive 30mm EP, that FOV will remain sharper to the edge. Anyone tried them? The 16 and 7mm looked diffierent than these didn't they? Stellarvue makes great scopes and youll love yours. Has anyone out there tried both or have any thoughts? The most eyepieces I use are 65 to 70 degrees. I've pretty much settled on 68-72 degree eyepieces. I can easily watch a close double drift past the field stop of a type 6 Nagler and often do. Honestly, I don't mind a 50-degree view, but 70 is definitely more immersive. Cons: Very aberrated off-axis star images; slightly less than 82 field. The Omegons weight is 600 grams, at the lower end of the range for eyepieces in this group. LMU - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen, Macromedia University of Applied Sciences, Mediadesign University of Applied Sciences. They look absolutely identical apart from a few superficial features (eyecup, 1.25" barrel and rubber grip band). ), Call us at: 530 823 7796 Open Mon-Fri 9-5 Pacific Time, Read the review of the Stellarvue Optimus eyepieces by Tony Hallas in the May 2017 issue of Astronomy, Our EOP eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. If I'm pleased with the SV 28, I may just go with SVs to complete a set, we'll see. Unfortunately EP focal lengths are rarely exactly accurate and in the case of the axioms they were obviously paying homage to the original 23mm axiom and 24mm was close enough to call a 23. This is a superb eyepiece for the money, with the bonus of argon-filled waterproof construction to keep moisture from penetrating and fogging the eyepiece on humid nights. Which points out that the appropriate high power apparent field depends a lot on the focal length of the scope and whether the scope is tracking. They made their own products as well. Though advertised as 80, I found the apparent field matched a Naglers 82 field. I think they are made by the same company that made other brands, Orion, Zhumell, SmartAstronomy, et al. Meades new PWA (Premium Wide Angle) series is effectively a new version of their previous 82 UWA series, which is still available as of November 2020. There are more expensive products, but do they perform any better? I've been thinking about getting the 15mm as my first non-cheapo eyepiece so I'm looking forward to hearing what you think about it. The jump from 50 to 70 provides a much larger leap than 70 to 100 to my eyes. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 10 to 15 percent of the field, so very close to Nagler performance. In short, I found it uncomfortable to use. While stars do bloat a little at the very edge, the 83 SSW comes close to matching a Nagler for optical performance, with the benefit of slightly longer 14mm eye relief and a more comfortable twist-up eyecup. Posted by Steve Lightstone on 8th Aug 2020. I tested these on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. 8 & 10 Ethos has a bit more light transmission, but this EP is a fraction of the cost , and well worth it! Like twins separated at birth, Meades MWA (Mega Wide Angle) looks nearly identical to the Omegon Panorama2. You sometimes feel more like you are actually there, in the view. I'm hoping they will be sharp to the edge at f/7. It's nominally 1mm more of eye relief, but it seems like more because the edges of the field are just that bit more accessible. Theres a new alternative for the Celestron NexStar SE and NexStar Evolution series tripod a short, foldable tabletop tripod. They make a good addition to the Stellaruve brandedplanetary eyepieces he has already been selling. Edit: For clarification, I am referring to the apparent field of view of eyepieces, not the true field of view. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? : Yes Filter Thread? The 102 degree Nikon HWs are another good example. Heres a low-cost zoom eyepiece that actually works well. Having tried 52, 60, 70, 76 and 82, I'll stick between 70 and 82. Bottom Line: A superb and compact top-class eyepiece. In the 10 inch, that's 820x, the TFoV is slightly less than 6 arc-minutes, 1/10 of a degree. Bottom Line: A superb eyepiece for 2-inch focusers. Going Wide: Nine 82-Degree Eyepieces Compared, A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces, Price and Quality in a High-Power Zoom: SVBONY 3mm-8mm Zoom Review, Celestron Tabletop Tripod Review: Sometimes Smaller is Better. It just felt like a 68-degree field that was pushed slightly further out. We are fast approaching "galaxy" season, with the planets in the rear view mirror. The contrast is good and the view is clear from edge to edge. This 2 inch eyepiece is our widest field in the 82 degree range. His website at www.amazingsky.com has galleries of his images, plus links to his product review blog posts, video tutorials, and ebooks on astrophotography. A 20mm eyepiece with a 100 field for only $300 seems too good to be true! I haven't used it in the field and it's pretty heavy but it's my best shot and easy access. So that this makes sense - take your 30mm SuperView, focus on a nice cluster of stars (M45 akaPleiades is a great one). I'll be curiously watching how this pans out as to the origins of these EP's, if they end up being the old UWANs they are priced pretty competitively. All rights reserved. This is the largest and heaviest of the 1.25-inch eyepieces, with a mass of 400 grams. Orion sold them as did WO too. Performance is excellent, with stars sharp across all but the outer 10 percent of the field. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. if(sWOTrackPage)sWOTrackPage(); Another good example is the 50mm finderscope, from both WO and SV (I have both, mostly the same, both excellent). Eye relief is 15mm, a little longer than the Explore and Stellarvue competitors. Buy all three of our high end 82 degree eyepieces and save! HOW did the Stellarvue EPs work out???? This grade conversion formula, together with your degree program's Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), is a tool to help your convert grades earned in countries other than Germany. For me, I love 82 degrees, it feels just right. Its barrel fits only 2-inch focusers and so requires more costly 2-inch filters. Field stops are different. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. Notice how it's sharp in the center and as you get to the edge the stars grow tails? A 100 degree field of view provides the user with almost 1.5 times the area of an 82 degree eyepiece. Good decision! I don't use 2" eyepieces that much so I'm not interested in the 28mm, and for some reason the 7mm eyepieces that I have are rarely used. The apparent field is indeed noticeably wider than the other 82s. Because they're Stellarvue! Buy all three of our high end 82 degree eyepieces and save! I like having eyepieces at my fingertips. Introducing the Stellarvue Optimus eyepiece series. I think probably not. 3. The 4.5mm Morpheus is sharper than the Ethos SX, by a hair. Have fun experimenting! A great one-two punch when observing. and they are currently also sold under the labels: Aah but they are new new to Stellaruve. My conclusion upon testing this 100 group was that performance was more or less commensurate with price. This 9 mm eyepiece is ideal for moderate power work on moons, planets and dark sky objects. Cons: Heavy and 2-inch only; shorter eye relief. At under $200 this eyepiece is a great way to get those wide views at a reasonable price. Old thread, but thought I would ask here first just in case instead of starting something new Stellarvue is running a sale on a 3 piece set of their 82 degree eyepieces for $292 while ES 82's are on sale for $99 each. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. Read Alan Dyers review of five 100-degree eyepieces, Tag List televue Celestron eyepieces ORION TELESCOPE meade Explore Scientific vixen optics stellarvue antares morpheus. But it is an excellent eyepiece, for $80 less than the Tele Vue Ethos. Cheers. The new TS UWANs are waterproof and filled with nitrogen. It comes with a pouch with a belt clip. However, eyepiece preferences are very personal and you will find a lot of different opinions on this series and its individual focal length. Just received the set. Most suffer from variable plossl, svbony, SVBONY Zoom Eyepiece, Zoom eyepiece. I have never used any of the super mega ultra extra wide eyepieces. If the grading system of your university uses letter grades, you can assign a number to each letter grade. Pinpoint stars to the edge, M27 is amazing in my 14" Dobsonian. FWIW I looked at the Pleiades yesterday with a 32mm Plossl, a 24mm UFF (~65 AFOV) with my XT10 which has the same focal length as your telescope. Kunming maybe? National Ranking. Then MyGermanUniversity is the right place for you. Pros: Very good optics and waterproof construction. 100 degree eyepieces are quite amazing but they are also very large and can be quite heavy. I doubt this as JOC won't sell eyepieces to any US brand other than ES since 2012. Crappy skies so I havnt used them yet. I think these are the same that WO(?) A+ is the highest possible grade, and the lowest grade to pass a course is D. So if you assign numerical values in ascending order starting with 1, the input for the grade conversion is as follows: In the conversion tool, you enter 1as maximum grade (corresponding to A+), and 5 asminimum passing grade (corresponding to D). Building an set of eyepieces takes some time. I had been planning on getting ES 82 degree EP's, but I just couldn't pass these up for the $. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. The ES is solidly made and comfortable to use despite its short 11mm eye relief (measured from the top of the eyecup), due to the recessed eye lens (the specs state 15.6mm). Bottom Line: The standard of performance for 100 eyepieces. This 9 mm eyepiece is ideal for moderate power work on moons, planets and dark sky objects. Other than that, this eyepiece is excellent and certainly merits your consideration. A year ago, they had 3 focal lengths of 82 eyepieces of 4, 7, and 16mm, and I reported them in the 2016 Guide to eyepieces. I had the pleasure of looking through all of the Optimus eyepieces with Vic at the DSSP. Are you looking for a List of Universities in Germany for International Students? The Orion and Vixen 82 eyepieces are also superb in all aspects, though at prices similar to Tele Vue. Pros: Good off-axis sharpness and eye relief, but . That's easier with the smaller size of the 82 Naglers when compared to the 100 eyepieces, however I'm working on that. Haven't noticed these before. While low cost for a 100 eyepiece, consider import fees if ordering from Europe. Teasing me? The Stellarvue 82 and Meades new PWA provide good performance for a much lower price. Also, I view with eyeglasses because of my severe astigmatism. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)! (Yeah, yeah, I know that's asking a lot.). The 8-element Morpheus design provides nearly top-class performance for much less than the premium competition, which would also include Tele Vues 72 Delos series. Waiting Period: We are in continuous production and operate one year in advance. Old, from WO. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. There are lots of OEM products floating around. Grade Conversion using the Bavarian Formula. Do you search for top universities and information on admission requirements, language certificates (TOEFL/IELTS) and application deadlines? I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. The Explore 100 comes a very close second to Tele Vue in sharpness, with stars sharp across 90 percent of the field and still well contained at the edge. Certainly a keeper. I find that the longer the focal length of the scope, the more I wanted wider apparent fields. Effect of barlows / field flatness for AT60ED solar imaging, Jon Isaacs, SpaceConqueror3 and mrsjeff like this, sportsmed, edsmx5 and Someone4322 like this, Dave Mitsky, John Huntley, CeleNoptic and, izar187, pj_thomas and Alex Swartzinski like this. And the color-coded cosmetics of the SSW series are attractive, though somewhat moot in the dark under red light. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. }. But I have had really great customer service from stellarvue which is hard to beat, and I have always been happy with their equipment. All in all, exactly what you'd expect from Stellarvue: A great product at a reasonable price. Cons: Slightly soft off-axis performance. But I don't think I would want all my eyepieces to be 100 degree. Keep in mind, like appliances, or anything else, just because the OEM is the same, and they look the same on the outside, it doesn't mean they will always be the same on the inside. With a 10 inch Newtonian at an f5 focal ratio, the 50mm eyepiece you are considering will produce a 10mm exit pupil. I saw clear, sharp, spacious views of Jupiter and the Moon when I first tried this eyepiece, and it also works well on double stars. Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. These are $65 or so.., Observing in Northern/Southern Michigan, USA, The NEAF Report from nPAE Precision Astro Engineering. Eye relief is a comfortable 13mm and theres no annoying kidney-bean shadowing of the exit pupil, true of the others in this group. Despite its size and dual barrel, its mass is only 586 grams, less than some of the competitors. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. $65 a piece is very cheapfor these eyepieces, so you did a very good deal there. However, the Omegon and Meade both have apparent fields closer to 90 as I measured it. Nuff said! For some reason, uncle Al seems to have a monopoly on 13-16mm compact 82s that perform well in fast scopes as the 16 UWAN was the weak link in that line as well, but I don't remember ever trying the 16, or scrutinizing the 15mm axiom LX vs the 14 Meade or ES. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. Pros: Great optics; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view(click here for specifications), 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degreeapparent field of view (click here for specifications), 15.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degreeapparent field of view(click here for specifications). Enter the maximum grade, the minimum passing grade, and your current overall grade in the grading system of your university. We recommend this as the ideal deep sky eyepiece for viewing nebulae, clusters and galaxies. Pros: Lightest 100 with good eye relief. The focal length choices seems a bit odd to me: 28mm, 16mm, 7mm and 4mm, but perhaps more focal lengths will fill in the gaps later. this IS the best value in an ocular that I have found.., I'm super pleased with the product. Pros: Low price; good eye relief; solid construction. When I decided that I wasn't agreeing with an eyepiece, I sold it back on the used market for what I paid for it. Its smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the bigger ASIAir Plus astrophoto computer, but is it as good? A best buy. I need at least 22mm of effective eye relief. Edited by Someone4322, 06 March 2023 - 03:36 AM. Not to say that normal 50 and wide-field 65 eyepieces arent excellent, but for a more immersive viewing experience most telescope owners add at least one, if not several ultra-wide 82 eyepieces to their collection. Eye relief is an excellent 17 mm, longer than in more premium models, and the eyecup is extendable. I would be very surprised to find out that this new Stellarvue line is not the same as the new TS UWAN line. But yea I mainly like using EP's in the 70 - 82o FOV range. Not quite so easy a question. Munich, by far the largest city in southern Germany, lies about 30 miles (50 km) north of the edge of the Alps and along the Isar River, which flows through the middle of the city. Those I find are easiest to use. You will get more use out of middle and low magnification EP's now. I missed the 16mm and regretted it as it's a very useful focal length. It can just matter on how you want to frame objects personally I feel 60o or less FOV is like looking through a tunnel so I dont use those EP's as much even though I have some. You currently have javascript disabled. Bottom Line: The best for optics but others provide more comfortable viewing. The true field of view is 0.75 degrees, with an exit pupil of about 1.9 mm. Light Benders: 2" Astro-Physics MaxBright, 2" iStar dielectric, 2" Stellarvue Deluxe, 2" TAL/ NPZ dielectric, 2" Baader Amici prism . Edited by Jim7728, 08 October 2014 - 01:32 PM. Explore Scientific 11 mm - 82 Argon Purged Waterproof 1.25" Eyepiece SKU: EXS-EPWP8211-01 Focal Length: 11 mm Apparent Field of View: 82 degrees Barrel Size: 1.25" Eye Relief: 15.6 mm Free shipping $229.99 In Stock Add to cart As low as $7.43/Month Apertura 9mm - 27mm Zoom Eyepiece SKU: APT-ZOOM927 Focal Length: 9mm - 27mm The only cons I've noticed is that they are big and heavy and change the balance point for my small scope+cheap mount and like any other optical system they have to cool down to ambient temp to get the best view (which takes a few minutes). I purchased the 9mm to pair with the 20mm Optimus for my Stellarvue SVX125D refractor. Heres a low-cost zoom eyepiece that actually works well. I still focused on the field stop and never got the spacewalk views others enjoy. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. For low power, large FOV, I recommend you limit the eyepiece focal length to ~35 mm (thus a 7 mm exit pupil.) The 100 eyepiece tripod. The eyepiece offers a generous 15 mm of eye relief and has a standard foldable rubber eye cup. This grade conversion formula, together with your degree programs Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), is a tool to help your convert grades earned in countries other than Germany.

Matlab Merge Two Figures, 10000 Sunset Blvd Statues, T Shirt Dress H&m South Africa, Breckenridge Ice Sculptures 2021 Dates, Postgres 10 To 11 Breaking Changes, Articles S