waiting to send decision to author npjgeelong cats coaching staff 2022
43.75%, You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. See How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? 'Submission Transfers Waiting for Author's Approval'. Robert Eagling161167100-150Cell Press, ACSGuyGuy, Guypptsubmittedaccepted, 10email, Rory WatermanPreview, a new chapter in phosphorus chemistry begins, Figure 3. Resubmit for Review: This will require the Author to make major changes and another round of review will need to take place.. X-MOL Avoid listing multiple names of genes (or proteins) separated by a slash, as in 'Oct4/Pou5f1', as this is ambiguous (it could mean a ratio, a complex, alternative names or different subunits). If you have figures or tables prepared, include them with your appeal letter. The revised version is normally sent back to some or all of the original referees for re-review. A description of the statistical treatment of error analysis should be included in the figure legend. npj Series journals require potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and require referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. 110 Look up the journal's: Aims & scope Instructions for authors Editorial Board Blind peer review This journal checks for plagiarism . ICP14018916-1 Please refer to our editorial policies for more information. This checklist is not sent to the Reviewers but must be received by the Editors before the paper can be sent for peer-review. Authors should be listed last name first, followed by a comma and initials (followed by full stops) of given names. //--> If the Editors feel the work is of potential interest to the journal, however, they may express interest in seeing a future resubmission. Please note that schemes are not used; sequences of chemical reactions or experimental procedures should be submitted as figures, with appropriate captions. Collections and special issues follow the standard peer review policy. Codes and software should be available and properly referenced in the article and/or supplementary information. The thinnest lines in the final figure should be no smaller than one point wide. Code availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required): The underlying code [and training/validation datasets] for this study is available in [repository name] and can be accessed via this link [insert persistent URL to code].